Powered by Blogger.
RSS

Major Project: Marketing

Social media is becoming more and more popular these days, especially with technological enhancements, meaning it is much easier for everyone around the globe to access the internet. This means it is easier for filmmakers to advertise their projects, spreading the word free of charge. These reasons have influenced my decision to create a Sunday League Facebook page so people can start taking an interest in the programme, and hopefully help it become big in the near future.




I want to catch people's eye, as most audiences (particularly our target market), tend to scroll without taking much of an interest, unless it's aesthetically pleasing. With this in mind, I have carefully chosen images that will gain the publics eye, as well as a short description so they're not put off by big paragraphs. 

I want this page to be the starting blocks of the growth of Sunday League, and Tekkers TV as a production company; so will be using it regularly throughout the process.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Major Project: Coverage

One aspect of filming that I have realised is very important as a director is "coverage":

"As a director, you should begin planning what you’re going to do when you get to the set long before the shooting starts. Whether or not you’re working from a script, you should develop a shot list to ensure that whatever the subject you’re filming, you’ll get enough coverage to successfully edit the scene.

Coverage refers to the collection of shots you will film to tell the story of the scene. You might get some wide shots and some close-ups, and various other shots so that in the editing room, you’ll have many options to ensure the story is communicated in the most effective way possible."


Here is a video I found which tells me everything I need to know about coverage as a director, with useful tips:


I found this video very useful and interesting as it's informed that I need to get the right balance of coverage (something I have never thought about before). It makes good points that you can have too much coverage which ultimately affects the production. If I film too many takes of the same scene, then I'm losing too much precious time and money in the shoot week, as well as in the editing process.

On the other hand, it's showed me how important coverage is, as the example they used was very dull and slow with only one master shot. When I create my pilot (and future projects) I will make sure I get plenty of coverage i.e cutaways, so the editor can have shots to use and not have to demand a reshoot (which again is time and money).

One thing I have learnt recently is filming the reactions of characters, particularly in conversation scenes:

"Sometimes the camera should be on the silent character rather than the one with the most dialogue"  

This is great for editing (to protect performances/slip ups), as well as helping the programme cut quicker, and in turn giving it a good pace so the audience do not drift off.


  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Major Project: Cast Change

Due to jury service, one of our main actors had to pull out of the shoot, one week before we started filming. This came as a big surprise to us as he signed contracts and turned up to script reads/photo shoots. This had a big impact on our group as a whole as we had to redo the posters, title sequence, etc.

Luckily we remembered we had someone who was very keen to play Tom (the character that pulled out) so we set up a Skype interview as soon as possible and asked Mitchell (the auditionee) to read out a monologue that we prepared in previous auditions.

Straight away I knew Mitchell was perfect for the role of Tom as he was aggressive when he needed to be, was confident, and also very likeable. His physique matched the description of Tom too, so we hired him the next day and counted ourselves very lucky.

This lucky escape made me realise how important it is to have back-up actors in case one pulls out last minute. You never expect it to happen to you so close to film week, but this project showed that anything can happen. I will use this mistake and take this experience with me into future projects and make sure I have cast members on reserve so there isn't a last minute panic.



  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Major Project: Large Cast Research

I have never worked with this amount of cast before, so I've researched into what a director should do when working on such a large project:

"Don't start filming until you have enough budget for food supplies"

First of all I need to make sure we have enough food supplies, as the number 1 priority is to make sure my cast are happy and comfortable because they are more likely to perform to the best of their abilities that way. We will have runners to make sure this happens, as well as catering staff who will cook hot food on the exterior location days (football mainly).

"Communication and Leadership is key"

As director I need to stand up and take control of shoot days, whether that's directing actors, or leading crew members to specific time schedules. As there are so many people, I need to make sure I'm loud so everyone can hear my instructions, as well as make sure everyone stays silent (particularly when the camera is rolling).

I have also researched into large casts from the actors point of view, this interview video was carried out with cast members from the comedy "Skeem" who explain what it's like working with a large cast in a comedy:

 

Here the actors of "Skeem" talk about how working with a large cast is challenging, especially for a comedy, as everyone needs to get their timing perfect. This is vital as one slip up could ruin the whole mood/comedy value of the scene; therefore I need to make sure my actors know their cue's perfectly beforehand.

When actually filming the experts/professionals say to not introduce everyone at once. If you are introduced to more than a couple of people at a time, it’s fair to say that you’re not going to remember their names. If you slowly introduce your key characters, and flesh them out in their own personal characterisation bubble, they become more memorable, and once you start getting to know one or two of them at a time, it’ll be easier to remember them further into the story when new characters are being introduced.


I also need to make sure that the audience care about the characters. Giving the viewers a reason to care about the people populating the story, will help them remember them. Caring about the character is not necessarily the same as liking the character. Villains aren’t usually the most likeable characters, but they are often the most memorable because they serve a very specific role in the story. Like the Strood boys, I want them to be memorable for the last pitch scene, therefore I want them to make a dramatic entrance when they first appear on screen. Purpose makes a character more memorable, so I need to concentrate on giving the characters a purpose for their appearances.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Major Project: Working with Actors (Performance)

A major role in directing television programmes is working with actors/actresses and their performances. I have a script with many characters and heavy dialogue, so it's going to be a big challenge to direct everyone perfectly. I am used to working with a couple of actors per film, so to be faced with this challenge means plenty of research into how to direct actors is needed. I have found some do's and don't's that are key to directing success:

  • Set limited, positive goals: Say, “See if you can open the door softly this time —not, “This time don’t make such a racket with that closet.”

One trait I take pride in as director is my focus on positivity. I will always make sure my actors not only feel comfortable, but inject belief into them too, making them feel confident. On Sunday League, I have different actors who need motivating in different ways, so I will direct accordingly. Above is a key example of the language I need to use when giving a command e.g. "see if you can kick the ball higher this time"

  • Direct the actors attention to a particular kind of action: Say, Id like to see you try to figure out what he meant as you turn away. Make the suggestion specific, and locate it in a particular moment. Generalised suggestions that could apply anywhere aren’t helpful.

There are a number of scenes/shots where my actors need to nail the facial expressions to reinforce the mood. One would be when Don is talking to Dean and Ollie in the side room. Dean tells Don that his mate got jumped (very key moment in the script) therefore I'll make sure Don thinks about this and act accordingly e.g. "I'd like to see you try and think of how they feel right now"

  • Suggest a different subtext: such as, Try closing the door on him with finality rather than regret.

This is a command I use a lot when directing. If I'm not sure on the shot, then I'll suggest other ways of doing it, but still maintaining the actors confidence e.g. "try asking him in an anxious way rather than forceful"

  • Remind cast members where their character has just come from: Wind them up to each scene with a reminder: Youve just come from the stock exchange and seen your fathers savings vanish. This is vital while directing, because films are shot in small, out-of-order increments, and actors need constant orientation.

This step is vital, and one I will use throughout as our schedule means that we will not be filming in order of the script (like pretty much all productions) therefore, for example, I will be saying commands like "Right Malik (Dean), you've just woken up from the heavy night out"

  • Never demonstrate how youd like something played: This implies you are an actor and want a copy of yourself. But you are not an actor, and what you want is unique to that actor. Ask the cast for their solutions.

I must admit, I have used this technique in the past, therefore after reading this, I will refrain from using it in this production. I have a large cast therefore I need to make sure they're all happy and performing to the best of their abilities

  • Never give line readings: A line reading means the director reads the dialogue with the emotional inflection they wish the actor to provide and then tells the actor to say it like that. This is insulting for an actor and reveals a directors lack of imagination.

Again, I have used this technique in the past so it's very interesting to find out that it's insulting from an actors point of view. I'd argue that it's harmless due to knowing the script and tines inside out, however I also understand that my actors want to do it in their style and how they've pictured the character.

  • Never say, Just be yourself: This sets actors worrying: What did he really mean? How does he see me? Which me does he want? Focus your actor instead on aspects of her characters experience.

For this point, I believe that I CAN use "be yourself" to certain members of the cast, as that's one reason why I chose them. In Malik's and Jamie's case (Dean and Ollie) their natural personalities are very similar, if not identical to their characters, therefore I will be selective on this one.



  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Major Project: Directors Research

Some directors had their careers launched into the limelight by starting off with short films/television pilots. These people/films are my inspiration for my major project, as I want to become as successful as possible after starting at the bottom (just like they did):

Benh Zeitlin - Glory At Sea (2008)




In 2012, Zeitlin's debut feature Beasts of the Southern Wild swept the festival circuit, winning top prizes at both the Sundance and Cannes film festivals before ultimately picking up four Oscar nominations. Funding for the film wouldn't have been possible, however, had Zeitlin not won an award at South by Southwest in 2008 with the premiere of his precursor short, Glory at Sea.

It is 25 minutes long which is similar to mine, and is the reason why he has made it as a director. He wrote it and had more producers than me, however after analysing the credits, I have noticed that he had the same amount of cast as me as well as using exterior locations. He would not be well known for his latest 2 million dollar feature film if it wasn't for Glory At Sea, that only had a £100k budget.



Stephen Daldry - Eight (1998)




Stephen Daldry is best known for directing the famous film "Billy Elliot" which even went on to become a hit West End musical; however it was his 12 minute long short film "Eight" that got his foot in the door. Daldry said himself that this was a trial run for Billy Elliot, and was his first award in 1999 (a year before Elliot was made).

It is similar to my project in the way that it is based around football as well as realism. I found it very interesting to see how he filmed the football scenes, including the shots and non-diegetic sounds. The part I found most interesting and effective was the use of the non-diegetic voice over, which interchanged with diegetic dialogue. That is an aspect I would consider if my programme wasn't a comedy drama, as this wouldn't suit the generic conventions.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Major Project: Directing Editing

My role as Director has not ended in the post production stage, the relationship between editor and director is key to making the final piece come together. Luckily for me, I have worked with Chris on many projects so I know exactly what we need to do to create a successful edit with good teamwork. Despite this, I have taken the time to research into the relationship between directors and editors, and I found a very interesting video in which editors are asked about their experiences in working with different directors, and how they need to adapt to each others styles:




It's interesting to see everything from the editors perspective, and how they like to work with directors. Some say they like to have the director in the room so they know exactly what they want, whereas others say they like to have the director to come and go, giving honest opinions after each edit. 

As director, I believe the editor should be given time, space and freedom to work on what they do best. I tell Chris exactly what I want, however also up for listening to different ideas as he is the one who is spending his time cutting it altogether and finding all the fine details. I believe this works well, as we both find things/create ideas that the other did not find/think of, therefore creating a well thought out film with no mistakes and creative ideas. 

Professional editor, Julien Chichignoud, goes on to say in his article "How To Be A Good Director, According to an Editor":

"My favourite part about editing is the relationship with the director. I love it when I come up with something they hadn’t expected, then they tell me how great I am. I also love it when I do something that the director doesn’t like; we argue, and I lose. The idea is, that discussing your ideas and vision with someone else, will either change your view on it, or reinforce the fact that you were right in the first place. In both cases, your film will end up stronger and better for it." (Chichignoud, 2015)

Chichignoud has worked as both a director and editor (editing professionally for 11 years now), so he knows the importance of the relationship between director and editor from both sides. These articles and videos have really opened my eyes to the different aspects of directing an edit.



  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS